S v mushwena and others
Spletterms of this Court’s decision in S v Mushwena and Others 2004 NR 276(SC), the High Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter. Thereupon all the appellants, with the exception of appellant No. 6, i.e. accused No. 8,applied for leave to appeal to this Court. The Court a quo struck the application from the roll as ill-conceived and Splet18. jun. 1992 · S v Mushwena and Others (SA4/04 ) [2004] NASC 2 (21 July 2004); S v Narib (SA5/03 ) [2004] NASC 4 (29 October 2004); S v Shihepo and Another (SA23/03 ) [2004] NASC 7 (25 November 2004); S v Tjivela (SA14/03 ) [2004] NASC 9 (16 December 2004); S v Hoaeb (SA15/2002) [2004] NASC 10 (08 September 2004);
S v mushwena and others
Did you know?
SpletFor example, the Court’s decision in S v Mushwena & Others is one that hardly resonates with constitutional values of respect for the rule of law, respect for human dignity, and the right to fair trial. Splet18. jan. 2012 · This group consisted of four persons who were eventually handed over to the Namibian authorities since they were regarded as illegal immigrants. This group was …
Splet18. jan. 2012 · This dictum was quoted with approval in the case of Du Toit en Andere v Direkteur van Openbare Vervolging, Transvaal; In re S v Du Toit en Andere 2004 (2) SACR 584 (TPD) at 598 i – j – 599 (a). [34] This Court has not been placed in such a position and is thus not able to consider the application. This itself should dispose of the application. SpletThe judgment and order of the Supreme Court in the Mushwena appeal (case No SA 6/2004) allowing the state's appeal against the order of the High Court upholding a …
Splet09. feb. 2006 · The present matter is a sequel to S v Mushwena and 12 Others Case No. SA 6/2004 in which the Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the State against the judgment … Splet09. feb. 2006 · The present matter is a sequel to S v Mushwena and 12 Others Case No. SA 6/2004 in which the Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the State against the judgment …
Splet21 Children’s Act, Act No. 33 of 1960, Section 4(1). 22 Children’s Act, Act No. 33 of 1960, Section 4(2). 23 See Alternative report to Namibia’s first, second and third periodic reports on the implementation of the United 3
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALMPPHC/2024/64.html push or pull carthttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALMPPHC/2024/64.html push or pull innovationSpletAt his trial he raised a plea of lack of jurisdictionon the part of the Namibian courts in terms of s 106 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 21977. The High Court upheld his plea but … sedgwick lafayette laSplet06. apr. 2024 · Refworld is the leading source of information necessary for taking quality decisions on refugee status. Refworld contains a vast collection of reports relating to situations in countries of origin, policy documents and positions, and documents relating to international and national legal frameworks. The information has been carefully selected … sedgwick ks schoolsSpletView full document Assignment III Read the Supreme Court judgment in S v Mushwena and Others (SA4/04) [2004] NASC 2 (21 July 2004). Re-write this judgment (majority decision) in light of Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law as integrity and constructive interpretation. sedgwick lake mary officeSplet23. jun. 2005 · I would have assumed that in all towns close to the borders of Namibia, especially in the north, magistrates and prosecutors are aware of and have studied the … sedgwick lane horshamSpletThe decisions are recorded and summarised in the same way as Supreme Court decisions. In order to distinguish a Supreme Court decision from a High Court decision the abbreviation SC is placed at the end of the citation as opposed to HC. An example of a High Court citation would read as follows: S v Mushwena and twelve others 20004 (11) NCLP … push or pull marketing strategy